Legal Opinion

Carr v. City of Memphis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1927No. 4802PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Complainant assigns as error the dismissal of his bill of complaint upon the ground that it fails to allege that the taxes sought to be recovered from defendant were paid under protest, or under duress, and that, having been voluntarily paid, there can be no recovery therefor.

The bill of complaint "alleges payment of taxes under chapter 790 of the Private Acts of Tennessee of 1919; that said law is void because of noneomplianee with constitutional requirements, in that the proposed law was read in the Senate only one time, and that the subject of the chapter is not expressed in the title;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Barlow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. City of Detroit v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Board of Education v. ToennigsIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Security Nat. Bank of Watertown, SD v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Blank v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API