Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1908No. 1,518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Washington.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit' Judge.

The court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint in this case and dismissed it. The question for decision, therefore, is the sufficiency of that pleading. Upon its face it shows that the action was brought at the request of the Secretary of the Interior and the Commissio'ner of Indian Affairs and under the direction of the Attorney General. It alleges that, acting in accordance with Act Cong. July 4, 1884, c. 180, 23 Stat. 79, 80, entitled “An act making appropriations for the current and contingent expenses of the Indian Department, and for fulfilling treaty…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AshtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1909
  2. Starr v. JimWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. United States v. DoughtenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1911
  4. Phillip Edward Sifferman, V. Chelan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API