Ford v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the procedures for opening default as a matter of right under OCGA § 9-11-55 (a) are applicable, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-81, in forfeiture actions under OCGA § 16-13-49. The Court of Appeals, following its holding in State of Georgia v. Britt Caribe, Ltd., 154 Ga. App. 476 (268 SE2d 702) (1980), held that the default procedures under the Civil Practice Act are not applicable to forfeiture actions. Ford v. State of Georgia, 235 Ga. App. 755 (509 SE2d 734) (1998). We reverse based on Rojas v. State of Georgia, 269 Ga. 121…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rojas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State of Ga. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- State of Ga. v. Britt Caribe Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Christopher Mathis v. River City BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.