Legal Opinion

Geremia v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 2002No. 01-15840; D.C. No. CV-97-01166-DWHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

John David Geremia appeals pro se the summary judgment in favor of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Detective Ball, and the orders denying Gere-mia’s motions for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review summary judgment de novo, and denial of reconsideration for an abuse of discretion. Hayes v. Palm Seedlings Partners-A (In re Agricultural Research & Tech. Group, Inc.), 916 F.2d 528, 533 (9th Cir.1990). The district court properly granted summary judgment to the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and to Detective Ball…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Butler v. ElleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Smiddy v. VarneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Mcdade v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geremia v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API