Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Head

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— The appellee was an infant; he brought this suit by his next friend, against the appellant, to recover damages for the appellant’s negligence.

On the day ofjthe Presidential election, in 1876, the appellee and other boys were about the polls in the town of Mitchell ; it was between four and five o’clock in the afternoon; at that place the appellant’s road, running north and south, crosses Main street in the town of Mitchell, a street eighty feet wide *118running east and west. A switch, running southeasterly to a freight house, also crosses Main street close to the main track of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Rudolph v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. GoldsmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Butterfield v. TrittipoIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. MillicanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Goodrich v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Queen Insurance v. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API