In Re Collette

*221Dooley, J.,

¶ 20. dissenting. Not long ago, we made the following statement:

If PCR decisions in cases of collateral attack on predicate DUI convictions demonstrate that defendants are serving all or most of their sentence prior to a PCR determination that the predicate convictions used for enhancement are constitutionally infirm, the Supreme Court by administration or rule may calibrate a practical remedy to a real — not theoretical — problem.

State v. Boskind, 174 Vt. 184, 192, 807 A.2d 358, 365 (2002).

¶21. Despite this statement, today’s majority decision demonstrates two realities: (1) this…