Wilhelm v. Wilhelm

The evidence in the case is very unsatisfactory. Plaintiff almost totally failed to prove the allegations of his complaint. Only one of his witnesses tended to corroborate plaintiff’s testimony. The complaint is not definite in its charges but is very extravagant and the evidence fails, in our opinion, to support those charges. No possible good can result from detailing the evidence.

Defendant is corroborated by both of her daughters now grown. In these corroborations plaintiff is flatly contradicted. A large part of plaintiff’s testimony was outside of the issues framed by the pleadings. In…