Legal Opinion

State v. Gulley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Linn: George H. Burnett, Judge. James Gulley appeals from a conviction 'for selling liquor to a minor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

An information having been filed against the defendant, James Gulley, charging him with the crime of selling intoxicating liquor to a minor, he entered a plea of not guilty, and, a trial being had, the court, over his exception, charged the jury, in effect, that guilty knowledge by the defendant in respect to the minority of the person to whom the intoxicating liquor was sold is not an element of the crime; that the defendant’s ignorance of the fact of such person being a minor is no defense; and that, if they should find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant sold intoxicating liquor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCutcheon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Faulks v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Redmond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  4. Farbach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. State v. ChastainOregon Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. RaperOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. State v. EdlundOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State v. KolicheSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API