State v. Edlund
Oregon Supreme Court
From Coos: James W. Hamilton, Judge. The defendant, Otto Edlund, was convicted of illegally selling intoxicating liquor, and lie appeals. Submitted on brief under the proviso of Supreme Court Bule 18: 56 Or. 622 (117 Pac. xi). In Banc.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mu. Chief Justice Moore.
The defendant, Otto Edlund, was convicted of the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor in Coos County, Oregon, and appeals from the resulting judgment, assigning as errors the action of the court in refusing to direct a verdict of not guilty, in denying requested instructions and in giving instructions. The testimony introduced by the state tends to show that on February 14, 1916, at Marshfield, Oregon, Mode T. Burwell informed E. Edson he desired to purchase some whiskey, whereupon the latter replied it could be secured from the defendant, to whom…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. GulleyOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. GearOregon Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GrimmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. WinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.