Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles A. D'AmAto Appeal of Joseph D. D'amato, in No. 18782. Appeal of Joseph B. Nanartowicz, in No. 18783
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 20, 1970No. 18782, 18783PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Appellants D’Amato and Nanartowicz each pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of conspiracy to use the facilities of interstate commerce with intent to carry on unlawful gambling in violation of Section 1952, Title 18, U.S.C., to commit wire fraud in violation of Section 1343 of that title, and to cause the telephone company to extend facilities other than as specified in schedules filed with the Federal Communications Commission in violation of Sections 203(c) (3) and 501, Title 47, U.S.C. In addition, each pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of the substantive violation of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Robert ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Gerson NagelbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Marvin Rodgers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
4Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Ross Joseph StradaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Wilhelm MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John Scott AlarikCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.