Legal Opinion

Farnsworth v. Zerbst

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1938No. 8711PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

On the original hearing before us the petitioner-appellant was not represented by counsel, indeed had filed no brief. On this motion for rehearing we welcome the able brief of- counsel in his behalf and have given it full consideration. His summary of the points mainly relied on is this: “(1) That if any one of the above mentioned Constitutional provisions (Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments, U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 5, 6, 8) has been violated by the trial court, said court thereby lost all jurisdiction and Farnsworth is entitled to discharge. (2) That if the indictment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Riddle v. DycheSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. HolteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Curtis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. John T. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer and William Anderson, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Sidney A. Sparks, R. L. Lynd, D/B/A Sidney A. Sparks, Trustee v. Duval County Ranch Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Alberto Espinosa-CerpaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API