Legal Opinion

Maze v. Kentucky Court of Justice

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 17, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00018Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT ) BETH LEWIS MAZE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 3:19-cv-00018-GFVT ) V. ) ) OPINION KENTUCKY COURT OF JUSTICE, ) JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSION, et ) & al., ) ORDER ) Defendants. *** *** *** *** I Who watches the watchers? Juvenal, The Satires, Book 6, line 347 (“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”). In Kentucky—at least for judges—that job is given to the Kentucky Court of Justice, Judicial Conduct Commission. But Judge Beth Lewis Maze says there is a problem—the Commission has abused its power. So, she has come to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API