Bishop v. Descalzi
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Action by plaintiff to recover the sum of $590, balance due on a contract for oranges sold and delivered; also to recover the further sum of one thousand one hundred dollars damages for breach of the same contract by refusal of defendants to receive a part of the oranges sold and to pay for same. Judgment in favor of plaintiff on both demands, from which judgment defendants appeal.
The terms of the contract were as follows:
“Lindsay, California, October 21, 1916.
“This is to certify that the Descalzi Fruit Company of Pittsburg, have bought of D. 0. Bishop his entire crop of Washington Navel…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Fischer v. MeansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Foster v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
- Grivel v. WardlawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932