Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Means

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1948No. Civ. 7495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff and cross-defendant has appealed from a judgment of $2,090' which was rendered against him upon the cross-complaint, as damages for failure to accept delivery of a crop of banana squash purchased pursuant to a written contract. The squash were raised by the defendant and sold on contract to the plaintiff at a stipulated sum per ton. They were harvested and stored in defendant’s barn as per agreement and plaintiff was immediately notified that the crop was ready for delivery, but failed and refused to take or accept delivery. The squash deteriorated and rotted until they became…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pacific Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. La Lumia v. Northern California Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Blackburn v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Tweedle Bros. v. BerlinerOregon Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API