Legal Opinion

Oken v. Corcoran

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 18, 2000No. 99-27PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON joined. Judge MICHAEL wrote a concurring opinion, concurring in all but Part II.A. of the majority opinion and concurring in the judgment.

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner-appellant Steven Howard Oken, a Maryland inmate under sentence of death, appeals from the district court’s denial of his application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. Oken claims, inter alia, that the state trial court’s voir dire questions were constitutionally inadequate under Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Baker v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. CaroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Marcus Reymond Robinson v. Marvin L. Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. Corey Woodfolk v. Gary MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API