Legal Opinion

A.R. v. Chicago Bd. of Ed.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 27, 1999No. 1-98-2087Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

27 December 1999

FIRST DIVISION

No. 1-98-2087)

A.R., by her mother and )

legal guardian, M.R., ) Appeal from the) Circuit Court of

Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) Cook County.))

v. ) No. 97 L 7744))

CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION, ) Honorable) Kathy M. Flanagan,

Defendant-Appellee, ) Judge Presiding)

and LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC., ))

Defendant. )

2Opinion of the Court · TullyJustice Tully

On December 29, 1997, plaintiffs, A.R., and her mother and legal guardian, M.R., filed an amended complaint against defendants, Laidlaw Transit, Inc. and the Chicago Board of Education (Board) seeking compensation for injuries sustained by A.R. as the result of an alleged sex…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API