Abell v. Hunter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Jay cox, J.:
Two questions are presented for determination upon this appeal: (a) Were the appellants entitled to make this motion; and if so, (b) should the motion have been granted? •
As a preliminary to considering those questions the special act of 1923 should be entirely disassociated therefrom. The complaint herein shows that all the proceedings under section 348 of the Village Law (as amd. by Laws of 1915, chap. 257) were completed and the necessary certificate filed with the Secretary of State before that act was passed. Therefore, if those proceedings were valid the annexed territory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Co. v. PriestNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Prankard v. CooleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Lederer v. LedererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- In re MarvinNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Underwood v. Board of Trustees of PatchogueNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- La Porto v. Village of PhilmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Moritz v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lincoln Avenue Associates v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Mitrus v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- In re PrestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.