Legal Opinion
Mitrus v. Nichols
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gold (A. E.), J.
On March 13,1939, the then board of trustees of the village of Endicott, N. Y., adopted a resolution to annex certain territory to the village. (Village Law, § 348.) On April tenth a new board of trustees decided to repeal it. Petitioner, claiming *870that the repeal was invalid, seeks an order compelling the mayor, village clerk and trustees to perfect the annexation by making and filing the necessary certificate, description and map. (Village Law, § 348, subd. 5.)
The legality of the original resolution is not seriously challenged. Only a single fault is found in the prehminary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dash v. Van KleeckNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- The People v. . Simeon DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Talcott v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Trustees of Jamaica v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Matter of Long Island R.R. Co. v. HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Bradley v. Town of ArgoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Parmer Realty Corp. v. BercowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953