Legal Opinion

Domenic Grosso a/k/a Domenic L. Grosso v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 2016No. 4D14-3971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred when it sua sponte deemed a post-dismissal motion' for costs abandoned after the motion languished on the docket for eighteen months. We find the trial court properly exercised its inherent authority.

HSBC Bank brought a foreclosure action against its borrower, Domenic Grosso. A year later, HSBC voluntarily dismissed the action and the case was closed. The case was reopened when counsel for the Borrower timely filed a motion for costs, including' attorneys’ fees, under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(d).

There was no record activity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Amendments to Fl. Rules of Civ. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Frohman v. Bar-OrSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Petition of Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Bridier v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Delio v. LandmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grosso v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API