Bextermueller v. Busken
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Commissioner.
In this action the plaintiffs-respondents sought to recover $7,000.00 paid by them to the defendants-appellants as earnest money on an unconsummated contract of sale for the purchase of a farm. The parties will be referred to by their designation in the trial court. Plaintiffs received a jury verdict, and defendants have perfected their appeal from the judgment entered in accordance with that verdict.
The plaintiffs’ theory of recovery was based upon their contention that defendants had violated the provisions of the contract of sale with respect to a transfer of title “ *…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harms v. SimkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Duncan v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Peter St. Clair v. HellwegMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Massey v. ButtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- In Re First Nat. Bank of AdrianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Florida East Coast Railway Company v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- State v. ShawNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- MacCormick v. MacCormickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Lappin v. LappinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. ThurmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968