Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Jos. Hollander, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The taxing district of the City of Hewark levied taxes on the personal property of Jos. Hollander, Inc., a corporation now dissolved, for the years 1935, 1936 and 1937; and the question at issue is whether payment of the taxes may be enforced by mandamus against the trustees in dissolution of the assessed corporation, its directors and stockholders,' and the purchasers of the property it possessed at the time of its dissolution. The assessment for each of these years was in the sum of $100,000; and the taxes, interest and charges aggregated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Lane County v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. City of Boston v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. State v. Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. McInerny v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Township of Lyndhurst v. Priceline.Com Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. City of Newark v. Central & Lafayette Realty Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Garden State Racing Ass'n v. Township of Cherry HillNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
  4. Seatrain Lines v. Edgewater BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
  5. Keith MacH. Corp. v. South PlainfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API