Legal Opinion
Stricker v. Swift Bros. Construction Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1977No. 11799PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Chief Justice (on reassignment).
Plaintiff, a nonunion carpenter, brought this action against his former employer, Swift Brothers Construction Company (Swift Brothers), Carpenters Local Union # 783 (the union), and Max Adler, the union’s business representative, seeking damages for the termination of his employment status with Swift Brothers. His complaint *501alleged that defendants had, either jointly or severally, caused the termination of his employment because of his nonunion status, contrary to the provisions of SDCL 60-8, the right-to-work law. The complaint also alleged that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Houston Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., and Construction Employers' Association of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Associated General Contractors v. Otter Tail Power Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1978
- Fraternal Order of Police v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Johnson v. ELECTRONIC SALES & SERVICE CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.