Legal Opinion
Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 1982No. 13370PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from orders dismissing appellant’s complaint. We reverse and remand.
*902In his complaint praying for general and punitive damages from appellees, Twin City Construction Company, Inc. (Company), and Iron Workers Local Union No. 184 (Union), appellant alleged that appellees had terminated his employment because of his non-membership in the union, in violation of the South Dakota right-to-work law (SDCL 60-8-3).1 In granting the motion to dismiss, the trial court concluded that it was without jurisdiction to consider appellant’s claim inasmuch as the activity…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Mathews v. Twin City Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984