Legal Opinion

Kelly v. United Financial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1971No. Civ. No. 37576Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

Plaintiffs were the sole officers and shareholders of Krim Construction Company (hereinafter “Krim”). To finance a student housing project in Isla Vista, California, Krim entered into a “take-out” agreement with United. This written agreement provided that, upon certain conditions to be met by Krim, United would loan Krim $950,000 by April 18, 1964. On November 25, 1964, United extended its commitment until November 30, 1965. The loans were not made and plaintiffs claim damages in the amount of $28,500—being the amounts paid by Krim to induce the making of the “take-out”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dabney v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Costello v. Atlas Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1967
  3. Ira Haupt & Co. v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API