Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Quaorm

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1983No. 82-1067PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

This case presents the question whether a landlord who brings an action for possession of real estate based on a tenant’s failure to pay increased rent — rent which the Rent Administrator approved subject to a condition that the Rental Housing Commission (RHC) receive a letter from the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) confirming abatement of housing code violations — may contest in court the legality of the Rent Administrator’s condition, without having appealed that ruling initially to the RHC. We hold that the landlord may not do so.

I

A landlord…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Florida Weld. & E. Serv., Inc. v. American Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. DeLevay v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Auger v. D.C. Board of Appeals & ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Strand v. FrenkelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. C Street Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API