Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Security Corp. v. Suchman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1954Published

1DissentDesmond, J.

I would affirm here.

By the judgment in the mortgage foreclosure action to which defendant as tenant was a party, the tenant’s lease expired just as if its term had run out, and, were it not for the emergency rent laws, there would thereafter have been no landlord-tenant relationship and summary proceedings would not have been available (Greene v. Geiger, 46 App. Div. 210; Commonwealth Mtge. Co. v. De Waltoff, 135 App. Div. 33, 35). But the emergency rent laws gave an occupant with an expired lease the status of a “ tenant ” if he chose to remain in possession (Wasservogel v. Meyerowitz, 300…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De WaltoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Da Costa v. Hamilton Republican ClubNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Pfalzgraf v. VosoNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Greene v. GeigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API