Legal Opinion
Da Costa v. Hamilton Republican Club
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1946PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The plaintiff has secured a judgment of foreclosure against "the defendants, and a sale has been held under which the plaintiff has become the owner of the property. The defendant Hamilton Republican Club, former owner of the premises, has remained in possession. The plaintiff now seeks *867a writ of assistance to remove this defendant under the provisions of section 985 of the Civil Practice Act. The defendant resists on the ground that the Emergency Rent Laws bar such, a course. The plaintiff urges that the Emergency Rent Laws do not apply to the premises in question, that the laws do not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pfalzgraf v. VosoNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Kilpatrick v. Argyle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Niman v. NimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. DannenhofferNew York Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gross v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Surratt v. Real Estate Exchange, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- United Institutional Servicing Corp. v. SantiagoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- SRF Builders Capital Corp. v. VenturaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.