Legal Opinion

Darrow v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1914No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Delta; Flannigan, J. Ejectment by John Darrow and others against the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiffs brought an action of ejectment to recover from defendant the possession of lots 9 and 10 of block 6 of the village of Rapid River, in Delta county. The defendant acquired the title thereto by warranty deed on September, 29, 1896. The lots were bid in by the State for unpaid taxes for the years 1897 to 1906, both inclusive. On April 29, 1910, the auditor general deeded the lots to the State, pursuant to section 127 of the tax law (Act No. 206, Pub. Acts 1893, 1 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 1898), which placed them in the list of tax homestead lands. This deed was recorded in Delta county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. O'Connor v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Beuthien v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Fitschen v. OlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chiodo v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. DoctorMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Price v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hartman v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lyon v. DentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API