Troutenko v. Troutenko

EVANS, Justice.

Appellant’s sole point of error is that the trial court’s divorce decree lacks requisite certainty insofar as it awards an interest in appellant’s retirement plan.

The decree awarded appellee an interest in appellant’s retirement plan with Anderson Clayton & Company, to be determined as follows:

“Said interest shall be computed by determining the period of time Respondent, Valentine John Troutenko, has been employed by Anderson Clayton & Co. and the period of time Petitioner and Respondent have been legally married, the latter period having been established as 321 months. The…