Automotive Finance Corp. v. Automax of Northern Illinois, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Automotive Finance Corporation (“Automotive”) has just filed its Complaint for Monetary Damages and Other Relief against Automax of Northern Illinois, Inc. (“Automax”), Jack Meade (“Meade”) and John Does 1 through 10 (“Doe Defendants”), purporting to invoke federal subject matter jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship grounds under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 1 Because such jurisdiction plainly (and indeed concededly) does not exist on the face of Automotive’s Complaint, this Court sua sponte dismisses both the Complaint and this action on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Guaranty National Title Company, Inc. v. J.E.G. AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Patrick Held v. Robert T. Held, Sr., Individually and as Trustee of Bodee Investment Trust Municipal Bond Portfolio of Patrick HeldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Central National Bank in ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacKason v. Diamond Financial LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Equity Trust Company Custodian v. Windwrap, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020