Legal Opinion
Surface Art, Inc. v. Tesserae Technologies, LLC, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 20, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00924Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 SURFACE ART, INC., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00924-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 13 v. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 TESSERAE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendants Tesserae Technologies, 18 LLC, and David Drishpon (together, “Tesserae Defendants”) to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third 19 Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (Dkt. No. 48) as to five claims against Defendant Drishpon. Dkt. 20 No. 50. Having reviewed the Tesserae Defendants’ motion,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.