Byers v. Creeco Mill & Elevator Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentWilliams, Justice
(dissenting) :
I am unable to agree with the majority-opinion.
It is my conclusion that the effect of the majority holding is that medical testimony to the effect that claimant’s condition was not caused by his work is sufficient to sustain an order of the State Industrial Court denying an award to such claimant. Such a determination does not decide the basic issue here involved, which is whether or not there was any evidence that the claimant’s work did not aggravate or accelerate an admitted latent pre-disposing condition.
If a workman’s physical structure gives way under stress of his usual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patrick & Tillman Drilling Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Ben Hur Coal Company v. OrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Adams v. Reed Roller Bit CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Kelley v. Enid Terminal ElevatorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Truck and Trailer Sales and Service v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.