Legal Opinion
Cordeiro v. Saul
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 2, 2019No. Civil Action No. 18-10203-PBSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Cheryl Ann Cordeiro brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision denying her application for Social Security Disability Insurance ("SSDI"). She suffers from major depressive and anxiety disorders and seeks SSDI benefits for September 1, 2000 to December 31, 2005. She claims that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") ignored and misconstrued key evidence, failed to develop the record, and misapplied the vocational expert's testimony.
For the following reasons, the Court ALLOWS…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aziz v. Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021