Legal Opinion

Biggers v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1916Published

Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Catoosa superior court. March 10, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

1. “The judgment of the trial court refusing a motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence will not be disturbed when the motion fails to show, by affidavit of the movant and each of his counsel, that they did not know of the existence of such evidence before the trial, and that the same could not have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence.” Pharr v. Davis, 133 Ga. 759 (66 S. E. 917); Civil Code (1910), § 6068.

*858March 16, 1916. Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Catoosa superior court. March 10, 1915. J. H. Anderson and W. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. J. H.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pharr v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API