Legal Opinion

Pharr v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

•Complaint for land. Before Judge Brand. Gwinnett superior court. December 6, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “Affidavits relating to a ground of a motion for a new trial, which are not referred to therein, nor attached to the motion as exhibits, nor filed with the motion as a part thereof, but each separately filed, can not be considered by this court when transmitted as a part of the record.” Sasser v. State, 129 Ga. 541 (13), (59 S. E. 255).

2. A judgment of the trial court refusing a motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence will not be disturbed when the motion fails to show, “by affidavit of the movant and each of his counsel, that they did not know of the existence of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sasser v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Coldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. LeCounte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Biggers v. MathewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Booth v. RickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API