Legal Opinion

Finke v. Sil-Gold Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtPaul J. Widlitz, J.

Motion by the plaintiffs for summary judgment in an action to recover on a series of 24 promissory notes.

Motion granted. The papers submitted reveal no issues of fact requiring a trial.

Briefly stated, it appears that the individual defendants controlled two corporations, Sil-Gold Corp. and Siltan Corp.; that on or about September 23, 1958 Siltan made three promissory notes totaling $6,000, and, on or about June 16, 1958, Sil-Gold made three promissory notes totaling $6,000, all payable to the order of Island Factors Co., a name under which the plaintiffs’ decedent, Benjamin Rubin, did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Werfel v. Zivnostenska BankaNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Dodwell & Co. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Bulger v. Colonial House of Flushing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Greenberg v. UghettoNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API