Finke v. Sil-Gold Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul J. Widlitz, J.
Motion by the plaintiffs for summary judgment in an action to recover on a series of 24 promissory notes.
Motion granted. The papers submitted reveal no issues of fact requiring a trial.
Briefly stated, it appears that the individual defendants controlled two corporations, Sil-Gold Corp. and Siltan Corp.; that on or about September 23, 1958 Siltan made three promissory notes totaling $6,000, and, on or about June 16, 1958, Sil-Gold made three promissory notes totaling $6,000, all payable to the order of Island Factors Co., a name under which the plaintiffs’ decedent, Benjamin Rubin, did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Werfel v. Zivnostenska BankaNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Dodwell & Co. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Bulger v. Colonial House of Flushing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Greenberg v. UghettoNew York Supreme Court · 1959