Legal Opinion

Searcy v. Ada County Prosecuting Attorney's Office (In Re Searcy)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2012No. BAP ID-11-1060-DJuMk; Bankruptcy 09-00248-TLM; Adversary 09-06082-TLMPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The appellant Barryngton Eugene Sear-cy (“Mr. Searcy”) appeals the bankruptcy court’s Memorandum of Decision (“Memorandum Decision”) and Order determining that attorney’s fees and costs in the total amount of $13,172.00, awarded by the Idaho state District Court and Court of Appeals against Mr. Searcy and in favor of the appellee Ada County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office (“Ada County”), are excepted from Mr. Searcy’s discharge in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(7) and (17). 1 We AFFIRM.

Factual Background

The essential facts in this appeal are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adinolfi v. Meyer (In Re Adinolfi)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. In re DickersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2014
  3. California Employment Development Department v. Hansen (In Re Hansen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. (BK) In Re: Ernesto & Marilyn PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Adinolfi v. Meyer (In Re Adinolfi)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API