Kipp v. Fitch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Chisago county, in favor of defendant Fitch, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Crosby, J. The notice of expiration of redemption- was invalid.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Chisago county, in favor of defendant Fitch, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Crosby, J. The notice of expiration of redemption- was invalid. Where the notice sets forth the matters required by statute but misstates the day and year of the sale or any other material fact and the misstatements are so interwoven into the notice as to contradict its statutory requirements, and the notice is thereby rendered misleading, the defect is fatal to the validity of the tax deed. Black, Tax Titles, § 332; Long v. Wolf, 25 Kan.…
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The appeal in this case is from that part of the judgment which adjudges that the tax title held by the defendant Fitch is valid, and that he is the owner of certain 80 acres of land, part of that described in the complaint. The complaint is made under G. S. 1894, § 5821, to set aside the adverse claim of the defendants to the land in question, arising from a tax judgment, tax certificate, and tax deed.
*67Upon the trial, the parties admitted •
That the notice of the clerk of the court, attached to the published delinquent list upon which the tax judgment described in the last named tax…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Long v. WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Parker v. BranchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hunzicker v. PulliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Bruce v. PopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917