Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Reed, with whom Mr. Justice Burton joins,
dissenting.
The opinion of the Court states that “the crucial questions in this case narrow down to these: (1) Is there a judicially established federal admiralty rule governing these warranties? (2) If not, should we fashion one?” *325By question (1) the Court means, as its opinion shows, a federal admiralty rule that a warranty of an insured is to be strictly enforced with the result that a breach of the warranty relieves the insurer of liability for loss although the breach was not shown to have contributed to the loss.
The Court concludes…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.