Legal Opinion

Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. Bank of America

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division properly concluded that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment. In its motion for summary judgment, plaintiff established that defendant improperly allowed release of the title to the purchased goods and that plaintiff was damaged in the amount of $161,078.58. The uncontroverted proof showed that plaintiff delivered to defendant a collection order for the goods which authorized release of documents of title only upon payment of $161,078.58 or *1033upon receipt of a guarantee…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kay-Bee Toys Corp. v. Winston Sports Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Donnell v. Madison Avenue-53rd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API