Legal Opinion
Donnell v. Madison Avenue-53rd Street Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about November 24, 1993, which granted defendants-respondents’ motions to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motions denied, without costs.
Defendant 510 Madison Avenue Camera & Electronics Corp. did not serve plaintiff with a 90-day notice and, thus, is not entitled to dismissal of the complaint (CPLR 3216 [b] [3]; Juracka v Ferrara, 137 AD2d 921, 923, lv dismissed 72 NY2d 840, mot to renew mot for lv to appeal denied 74 NY2d 642; Seidman v Shames, 130 AD2d 568,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Juracka v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Seidman v. ShamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. Bank of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ramon v. ZangariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Walker v. GibbonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- James v. MTA-Long Island Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Goldstein v. BerenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- LDA Corp. v. Meringoff PropertiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.