Buettmann v. Buettmann
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The trial court denied both the plaintiff-wife’s petition for divorce and the defendant-husband’s crossbill for divorce. Both appealed. We note the scope of our review. Under Civil Rule 73.01, V.A.M.R., we review the case on both the law and the evidence, making our findings of fact but giving regard to the trial court’s better opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses, and we may reverse only if the decree is clearly erroneous.
For either party to be entitled to a divorce that party must be innocent, that is, free of conduct which would entitle the other to a…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- S. v. GMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Graves v. WoodenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Price v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Cadenhead v. CadenheadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Keefe v. KeefeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mince v. MinceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Urbanek v. UrbanekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973