Legal Opinion
Carroll v. City of Lowell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 1, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
In these two actions of tort brought against the defendant for an alleged defect on a public way the jury returned verdicts for the plaintiffs. The cases are here on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of motions for directed verdicts.
It was agreed that the plaintiffs had complied with the requirements of the statute as to notice. And the defendant does not argue that the evidence would not warrant a finding that the plaintiffs were injured when an automobile in which they were riding collided with an obstruction on a public way in the city of Lowell. Nor does it contend that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bresnahan v. PromanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Hayes v. Inhabitants of Hyde ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Feeley v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Ouillette v. SheerinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Stone v. MullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scholl v. New England Power Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Tomasello v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Delgado v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Coyne v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Madden v. BermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.