Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1926No. 5095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

In a petition for certiorari, error is assigned upon the following decision of the Court of Appeals: “It being shown by the petition that the alleged continuous tort was committed partly in one of the counties of this State, and continued beyond the limits of this State over in an adjoining State, in which latter State the principal injury was committed, the county where the tort originated did not have exclusive jurisdiction (Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Dorsey, 116 Ga. 719 (3), 42 S. E. 1024); and since ‘the statutory rule confining suits against railroad companies for torts to the county in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Rwy. Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Watson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API