Watson v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. December term, 1891.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
1. By the constitution, the county in which a defendant is subject to bo sued is ordinarily that in which he resides, and no other. • Code, §5172. But a person may be a resident of two or more counties at the same time. Code, §1691. Where a railroad is not confined to one county, but extends from one to others so as to be partly in several, the owner may, relatively to causes of action arising out of or connected with operating it, be treated by the legislature as residing in each of the several counties in which the road is located. This has been done to a limited…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bawknight v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reeves v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Savannah, Florida & Western Rwy. Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Gainesville Midland Railroad v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- General Reduction Co. v. TharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Askew & Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.