In re the Estate of Cruikshank
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Despite the fact that almost a quarter of a century has elapsed since its enunciation, there are still numerous eminent members of the bar to whom the mere mention of the decision in Matter of Ziegler (218 N. Y. 544, 556) is an anathema. The Court of Appeals there unanimously affirmed the determination of the Appellate Division (168 App. Div. 735, 745), which had held that where a c ^executor had fully accounted and had died prior to the *515entry of a decree of judicial settlement, but had not paid out the principal funds, the 'assets of the estate, on his death, had automatically…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Accounting of ZieglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Chisolm v. HamersleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- In re the Estate of JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ZieglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Estate of SaphirNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Estate of MorriseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- People v. BlairAlbany City Court · 2009
- People v. HillCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2007
- In re the Estate of GourlayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.