Legal Opinion

Pout v. Babcock

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1970No. 3844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE SUEUR, Judge.

The basis of this action lies in contract. On October 8, 1965, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement which required that the defendant, in return for valuable consideration, design and construct a swimming pool on the rear lawn at plaintiff’s residence. Shortly after completion, the plaintiff discovered certain alleged defects in the construction and design of the pool and brought this action for damages. The trial court found for the plaintiff in the sum of $540.00 and the defendant has appealed.

The most serious defect alleged by the plaintiff and found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faslund v. KendrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Rathe v. MaherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Byrnes v. BostickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Singer Lumbermart, Inc. v. Park Manor HomesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Catalina Pools v. SellersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Hall v. Kaiser Aluminum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API