Legal Opinion
Hall v. Kaiser Aluminum Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1976No. 7345Published
1Opinion
ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
Able counsel for appellant has made timely application for a rehearing based upon the contention that the uncon-troverted testimony of the plaintiff must be accepted as true citing, as authority, Excel Finance Mid City, Inc. v. Williams, 205 So.2d 846 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1968). While the record supports a conclusion that plaintiff’s testimony is, in fact, controverted, we have, nevertheless, given consideration to this contention particularly because of the dissenting opinion of our colleague.
We are more persuaded by Polit v. Babcock, 232 So.2d 916 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1970) in which…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- C. Louis Wood and Hallie D. Wood v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Jose A. Ramos v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Hollier v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.