Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Decker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1986No. 73 M.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*367 OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents an issue identical to that recently addressed by this court in Mazzagatti v. Everingham, 512 Pa. 266, 516 A.2d 672 (1986), wherein we held that a plaintiff who does not experience a contemporaneous observance of tortious injury to a close relative does not state a cause of action for the negligent infliction of emotional distress under the parameters enunciated in Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146, 404 A.2d 672 (1979).

I

The facts of the instant case are similar to those of Mazzagatti, supra, in that the plaintiff-parent did not witness the accident…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Yandrich v. RadicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Brooks v. DeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Neff v. LassoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Brinkman v. Shiley, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API