Rudzinskas v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION MARYANN RUDZINSKAS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:24-cv-009 v. RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. O RDE R Plaintiff Maryann Rudzinskas brought this action for negligent manufacturing and negligent failure to warn against Defendant Retractable Technologies, Inc., alleging that the needle from Defendant’s VanishPoint syringes defectively broke off, shot into her, and lodged under her skin. (Doc. 1-1.) After completing discovery, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Reese v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.